Diego Rivera, muralist, Pan-American Unity

Transnational America

Brooklyn College, CUNY, Spring 2010, Prof. James Davis

Mar 14, 2010

José Martí and Randolph Bourne

These two were among the most original thinkers and gifted writers in the turn-of-the-century U.S. To appreciate their distinctive visions, however, some biographical background and an analytical framework may be useful.

Martí's "Our America" (Reader 81-85)
  • By "America," Martí does not have in mind the U.S. What does he have in mind? How can we tell? Who is the "formidable neighbor who does not know [America]" (295)?
  • Martí shares a rhetoric of masculinity with Roosevelt, whom we recently read. E.g., "Only runts whose growth is stunted will lack the necessary valor"; "their puny arms with bracelets and painted nails"; "delicate creatures who are men but do not want to do men's work" (289). However, his vision for the Americas is very different from Roosevelt's. How so?
  • Martí relies on oppositions between the "natural" man and the "artificial" man, between knowledge derived locally and knowledge imported from afar. How do these oppositions advance his argument?
  • This essay is full of figurative language - metaphors, similes, metonymy. E.g., "We wore epaulets and judge's robes, in countries that came into the world wearing rope sandals and Indian headbands" (293); "Make wine from plantains; it may be sour, but it is our wine!" (293). What are some other examples you notice of Martí's use of figurative language?
Bourne, "Trans-National America" (Reader 113-17)
  • Why is it okay with Bourne that assimilation - the celebrated melting-pot - is not working as well as others hoped?
  • Why, according to Bourne, has the Anglo-Saxon in the U.S. become hostile and disappointed in immigrants? Why does he feel this hostility and disappointment are misplaced?
  • What other myths about the U.S. cultural landscape does Bourne wish to challenge?

No comments:

Post a Comment